• On MovieTome: Leaked images from TRANSFORMERS 2?
August 15, 2008 6:00 AM PDT

10 Worst Web glitches of 2008 (so far)

Posted by Rafe Needleman
  • Print

We have been reminded several times lately that Web 2.0 is in no way a synonym for "reliable." Major services have crashed. Big product launches have fizzled. Users have raised their collective fists in the air. What's going on? Is the Web crumbling? Well, no, it's not. But users' expectations are rising, and Web companies often get themselves into trouble by promising far more than they can deliver.

Here's the timeline of offline:

Amazon S3 (Also: Google App Engine)
When: February 15 (Amazon); June 17 (Google)

What happened: These massive infrastructure services, Amazon's S3 especially, underpin many Web 2.0 companies. When these services fail, big sites go down. When the sites go down, they lose money.

Corporate coping behavior: Amazon CTO Werner Vogels banished to the lecture circuit to explain why S3 is still more reliable than any servers you could run yourself.

The damage: Companies forced to re-consider their reliance on "cloud computing."

Twitter
When: April, May, June. July too? Who cares?

What happened: Twitter began to get unreliable. It's up, then it's down. Repeat.

Corporate coping behavior: During the bad spells, Twitter turns off key features of the service -- like access from Twitter helper apps, or the "replies" tab on the site -- to decrease the load. Twitter also buys the search engine Summize, which adds a new level of utility to the service.

The damage: Twitter was becoming part of the social fabric of the technology community. When it began to get flakey, marquee users abandoned the service and fled to rivals like Friendfeed. The problems appear to have been resolved, but the damage may never be repaired.

Firefox
When: June 17

What happened: Mozilla announced the release data of the Firefox 3.0 and its goal to get a million downloads on that day. When the day comes, the download doesn't work. The downloads start up later, and Mozilla goes on not just to meet its download goal but utterly crush it.

Corporate coping behavior: Mozilla changes "Download Day" to "The 24-hour Period that Starts When We Say it Does."

The damage: Temporary embarrassment, which is overshadowed by insane success.

Amazon
When: June 17

What happened: Amazon went offline for a big part of the U.S. workday. Millions of users had to go back to work.

Corporate coping behavior: Mad scramble to fix. What did you expect?

The damage: Estimated at $16,000 a minute. But long-term damage to the company is negligible (unlike the S3 outage).

Google Docs
When: July 8

What happened: Online productivity apps went offline, stranding users' files in the cloud.

Corporate coping behavior: Apology. Google has offline support (Google Gears) for an increasing number of its online apps. Which is fine, if you remember to set it up before the next outage.

The damage: Credibility. Online apps are being pitched by companies like Google as credible replacements to traditional apps like Microsoft Office. Outages like this shake users' already tenuous faith in the reliability of services that hold their most important data files.

MobileMe
When: July 10

What happened: Apple launched its 3G iPhone with a new data sync service to replace .Mac. Sadly, it didn't work. For many users, key services like e-mail wouldn't update.

Corporate coping behavior: Jobs berates his staff in public; Apple gives subscribers 30 days of free service.

The damage: Poor uptake of the service, many disgruntled users, negative halo effect on the iPhone.

Cuil
When:July 27

What happened: Google scientist leaves Google, builds competitive search engine. At launch, it sucks. By the time it's working as advertised, nobody's paying attention anymore.

Corporate coping behavior: Company claims millions of users are so anxious to dump Google that they overload the new engine. Begs for time.

The damage: You only get one chance to make a first impression. Cuil's growth will be seriously clipped by its botched launch.

Scrabble
When:July 29

What happened: After finally getting off the stick and suing the much-loved Scrabulous off of Facebook, Hasbro releases its own online Scrabble app on the social platform. It crashes.

Corporate coping behavior: Scrabble owner Hasbro claims that hackers killed the service. No surprise: As Caroline McCarthy reported, "if you just look at the Scrabble application wall, it's pretty clear that there are a few people who are angry enough at Hasbro and EA to want to sabotage the game."

The damage: What's a seven-letter word for "global acrostic withdrawl?"

Gmail (Also: Hotmail)
When: August 12 (Gmail); February 26 (Hotmail)

What happened: OMG, Gmail is down. And unlike with client-based e-mail (Outlook), when your Web mail is offline, you can't even read the old stuff sitting in your inbox.

Corporate coping behavior: Google apologies, knows users will be back.

The damage: In the recent Gmail outage, upset users flocked to Twitter to complain. Miraculously, Twitter stayed up, despite a crushing load of hundreds of tweets a second from disgruntled Gmail users.

Netflix
When: August 14 and March 24.

What happened: Undisclosed troubles fell all 55 Netflix shipping centers. Twice. Users don't get their discs.

Corporate coping behavior: Netflix plans to refund fees to affected users, and reminds them they can watch streaming Netflix on their PC or Roku box. Although the company refuses to use the word "fallback" to describe this benefit.

The damage: Netflix customers have to watch old DVDs, live TV, Tivo, Unbox, Hulu... Wait a minute, do we really need Netflix?

And don't forget...
It's just August. There's plenty of time left in the year for more Web 2.0 disaster.

See also: Technologizer: A Brief History of Internet Outages

Rafe Needleman writes about start-ups, new technologies, and Web 2.0 products, as editor of CNET's Webware. E-mail Rafe.
Recent posts from Webware
No escaping Britney Spears: 2008's top searches
gOS Cloud: browser-based OS for Netbooks
Five financial Android apps to regulate your dough
Kontain launches a new, pretty blogging service
DeWolfe: 'Cautiously optimistic' about MySpace in recession
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 32 comments
by The_Decider August 15, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
Why call them Web 2.0 disasters? What makes them so special as to get saddled with a buzzword with absolutely no meaning?
Reply to this comment
by Blah9999 August 15, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
I agree completely- And how do you attribute Netflix users not getting their physical disks to a Web 2.0 problem?
by groink_hi August 15, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
In short, people are too weened on Web 2.0 services. The buzzword does have meaning; "Web 2.0" is technology that allows for interaction between people, rather than hosting static pages posted by the web page designer, aka Web 1.0. If you rely on Web 2.0-based services and do not have a contingency plan in-place in case the service is unavailable, that creates a "disaster." Things such as web-based applications, social network services, and e-commerce all have given its users an appearance of being invulnerable. The logic (or I should say "illogical") is much like, for example, leaving 1TB of data onto a USB hard drive with no backup. More and more - people who are not that technical will put all their marbles into the Web 2.0 bag. It'll just get worse and worse, but not because the engineers who develop and maintain these Web 2.0 services, but because the people who use them rely on these services too much.
by TV James August 15, 2008 10:15 AM PDT
I think "Hasbro Sucks" is more than seven letters.
Reply to this comment
by pauljweighell August 18, 2008 4:19 AM PDT
So you think stuff sucks if it doesn't allow you free use of other people's IP? Perhaps you are one of those whose dash for free stuff gums up the flakey web 2.0 offerings listed here then?
by amsoell August 15, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
How could you forget about Qtrax?! The promise of free, ad supported mp3 downloads got everyone all excited. Qtrax even sent out press releases touting contracts with all major record labels. Hours later, the same record labels sent out their own press releases claiming they've never heard of Qtrax. Of course, the "launch" was for a month, until they "relaunched" with a music player that had absolutely zero tracks available for download.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9859244-7.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13526_3-9859840-27.html
Reply to this comment
by StickyC August 15, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
RE: Cuil - I remember when Google first started out many years ago, it was plagued with downtime and was fairly miserable at searching compared to Yahoo. While the competition now has far more massive leads, dont discount Cuil yet.
Reply to this comment
by ozinvermont August 15, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
I would have thought the Youtube outage caused by a Pakistan ISP would have made the list.
Reply to this comment
by businesscontacts August 15, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
Yes, the youtube outage should be on the list
Reply to this comment
by gridwerk August 15, 2008 11:13 AM PDT
Probably no one cared about YouTube going down because few people are affected in very many meaningful ways if they cant watch Jackass kids fall of their skateboards, Obama tribute propaganda, or jailbait teeny-boppers dancing in their underwear to the latest Fiddy-Cent "tune".
Reply to this comment
by Igloo888888 August 15, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
Cuil is a brutal search engine. It has a LONG LONG LONG way to go to even get into top 10 material, never mind rival Google.
Reply to this comment
by ocpinay August 15, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
I love this article! Reliability is a quality web technology companies have to work on - sometimes the publicity hype is a product's downfall - especially when they fail to anticipate just how big a commotion they may cause.
Reply to this comment
by carlitosway74 August 15, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
Would the Sony PS3 2.40 firmware debacle apply? Tons of users had to send their PS3's to Sony and at first Sony was going to charge them $50 to get their systems to work. Its been fixed since but what a nightmare for PS3 gamers!
Reply to this comment
by August 15, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
YouTube is used for Jack Ass videos, but also for seminars and corporate training that folks don't mind being seen by the public. Some large companies, but also some small ones are in the mix. So YouTube being down does have a monetary (other than advertising revenue) value.
Reply to this comment
by pauljweighell August 18, 2008 4:21 AM PDT
and the ratio between junk vids and corporate training is ?
by AppleSuxLeo August 16, 2008 12:20 AM PDT
None of my free MSFT provided services ever went down. Hmmmm...trust Apple or Google ? Not !
Reply to this comment
by MiamiWebDesigner August 16, 2008 5:47 AM PDT
Gartner Group Gaffs and "Web 2.0" Techno-Hype

The renowned Gartner Group's latest Hype Cycle report places "Web 2.0" in a "Trough of Disillusionment":

http://tinyurl.com/6ycvs8

But for a few good chuckles, I suggest you Google the following and browse the first 20-30 listings:

failures Gartner Group
warnings Gartner Group
Gartner Group expects
Gartner Group predicts

As for "Web 2.0?, like so many tech articles posted since Tim O'Reilly (or was it Dale Dougherty?) first coined the term in 2004 (or was it 2005?), this one references "Web 2.0" as if it were something tangible--or at least a concept with clear, concise definition. It is not. In 2006, Web founder Sir Tim Berners-Lee sagely observed that "nobody knows what it means":

http://tinyurl.com/y6ewzy

In 2007, Michael Wesch put together this video that supposedly "explains what Web 2.0 really is about":

http://tinyurl.com/6pdz2q

It is a cool video. But the message is all about XML and how it can be used to separate form and content. There was no mention of CSS and XHTML, but no matter. I was writing XML parsers in the '90s, and XHTML/CSS web design pre-dates "Web 2.0" as well.

And now in 2008, the most honest thing we can say is that "Web 2.0" means whatever the techno-marketeer (ab)using it wants it to mean. Otherwise, why would intelligent people like Isaac O'Bannon still be writing articles asking "What is Web 2.0?":

http://tinyurl.com/5solok

And, why would McKinsey's just-released best-of-breed report entitled "Building the Web 2.0 Enterprise" ...

http://tinyurl.com/6sxls7

... include no attempt at defining the term other than to list the "Web 2.0 Tools" that comprise or enable it? And even there, the chief ingredient is identified only as "Web Services", adding more mystery to the mix as one ethereal term is offered up to explain another.

As originated in an Onstartups.com website design posting...

http://tinyurl.com/576sgs

... "Web 2.0" is like pornography: Nobody has defined it; you just have to know it when you see it.

Bruce Arnold, Web Design Miami Florida
http://www.PervasivePersuasion.com
Reply to this comment
by -=Taipan=- August 16, 2008 7:49 AM PDT
I was sitting here eating a jelly donut and wondering when YouTube was going to fail.

Greets
www.online-artikel.de
Reply to this comment
by jackvalko August 16, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
This 'phenom' is nothing new. The internet is a best-effort network, served by hortizontal infrastructure that is *designed* for failure. Moreover, the culture of internet engineering is largely tolerate of failures (except online financials). I'm surprised the bloody thing still works at all. Can we all right now decide this is just how it is and move on to some real news? I heard they found bigfoot!
Reply to this comment
by pauljweighell August 18, 2008 4:35 AM PDT
The net was designed to meet failure by the use of redundant path messaging and it has worked pretty well for decades now. The major apps like banking, military and trading seem pretty bullet proof to me. All the outages listed here are apps that were not designed as failsafe systems that can survive being flooded with the high volumes of junk that defines most of web 2.0 - i.e. free usage apps that just connect a load of kids to each other for no apparently useful purpose other than selling them rubbish. So we have a pattern here. Paid apps seem not to fail and free ones do. Are we surprised?
by lennysan August 16, 2008 5:01 PM PDT
I reviewed a few more events along these lines:
http://www.transparentuptime.com/2008/08/do-you-trust-cloud.html
Reply to this comment
by techiegirl2 August 17, 2008 1:32 PM PDT
great list.
Reply to this comment
by Mike Z August 18, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
So youtube going down isn't meaningful, but Scrabulous is?????

While I agree that youtube isn't *that* hard of a hit, it's far cry from losing scrabulous. Like, OMG, however will people get their game fix?
Reply to this comment
by mnl1121 August 18, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
YouTube going done because of the Pakistan ISP isn't a glitch. Well pretty much. They meant to block YouTube from Pakistan users and instead caused all of youtube to go out. a glitch but not one caused by the youtube company (google). All these glitches were caused by the company themselves.
Reply to this comment
by bbneo2 August 18, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
What type of cheese do you want with your "whine"?
So things aren't perfect? Eh? How many times have you had to reboot your Windows machine in the past year to restart your client email app to read your email? 5? 10? more? much more? Yeah. Me too.

Google gets a big pass from me for running such a massive, fantastic free webmail/personal cloud service. If you've got all the answers, run your own damn email server.
Reply to this comment
 See all 32 Comments >>
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

E-tailers eye Cyber Monday

After a better-than-expected Black Friday, retailers' hopes are up for a sale-heavy day online. Predictions, however, are mixed.


The other digital-TV transition

As digital TV migration nears, confusion mounts as some cable customers see basic cable channels disappear from their analog packages.


Photos: Space station marks a decade aloft

The first pieces of the International Space Station went into orbit 10 years ago. Now a full-fledged lab facility, it continues to grow.


advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right